The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given charts provide the demographic data of Yemen and Italy in 2000, which was categorized into 3 age groups, and expected figures for five decades later. Overall, Yemen’s 0-14 years old population was projected to moderately decline, whereas a marked increase was forecast for Italian aged older than 60.
It can be seen that in 2000, 50.1% of Yemen's population belonged to the 0-14-years age group, higher than that of the 15-69 years group by 3.8%, in comparison to the smallest portion of 3.6% that was accounted for by the 60+ years group. Over a span of 50 years, in contrast to an 11% rise in the 15-59 years population, the population aged 0 to 14 years old was predicted to decline notably by 13.1%.
We can also observe that despite being the majority of the Italian population in 2000, the 15-59 years age group was estimated to experience a remarkable drop to 46.2% in 2050. Conversely, an upward trend projection was made for the senior population, which was expected to jump from one-quarter in 2000 to 42.3% in a 50-year period and take the second place out of the 3 age groups.
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people say that giving a smaller amount of money weekly to children will help them become more capable of managing their money as they grow older Do you agree or disagree 89
- The pie charts show the destination of export goods in three countries in 2010 88
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 96
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, second, so, whereas, as for, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70618556701 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59581507916 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582474226804 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.0744446702 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.166666667 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.3333333333 22.9334400587 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3333333333 5.23603664747 236% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172302456214 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102178354693 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356785678676 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134062357425 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377526742257 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.63 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.