Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem?
It is a fact that multiple criminals have a tendency to continue to commit crimes after punished. This is happening due to several reasons. This dissertation will depict this phenomenon specifically and also offer some measures to deal with it.
There are two principal reasons for re-offenders. To commence with, sending criminals into prison is not always an ideal solution. In other words, offenders are put together so they easily make friends with other inmates. This such case even can make the situation worse because they tend to exchange information about what they have done before they were arrested. An egregious plan which beyond our anticipation can be carefully formed step by step. Another conspicuous cause of this situation is related to income sources. A person with a criminal record will find a job more difficult than others as people tend to avoid employing this kind of human. Moreover, most of them have inadequate education and basic skills in any field to maintain a job. As a result, an inevitable circumstance would have happened is that they convict crimes again regardless of the consequences.
To solve this problem, the government should take some solutions into consideration to hinder it before everything becomes more serious. Firstly, the aim of prisons is rehabilitation. Therefore, criminals have to be ensured that when they are sent into prison, they will have a chance to learn at least a specific job skill that is helpful in the future after they are released. A common thing that proceeded in many countries is establishing vocational training in prison. Additionally, giving these people the opportunity to useful things for their local communities to make up for the mistakes of the past. Community service is another way to reform offenders as it can alleviate the negative influence that prison can have. To exemplify, lawbreakers can be required to clean streets or cultivate crops.
In conclusion, recidivism has been one of the current problems for a long time but it can be tackled if the government adopts other approaches rather than just punishment
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-17 | ieltstest1 | 89 | view |
| 2022-09-09 | vovo | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-28 | Tuan Harry | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-20 | mrinal | 92 | view |
| 2021-08-05 | minhngoc_8 | 84 | view |
- Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment Why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem 56
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life What are these problems Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns 84
- Many countries import food from different parts of the world What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 84
- Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment Why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem 84
- Schools should encourage children to eat healthy food while others say that parents should teach them about having a healthy diet Discuss both views and give your opinion 63
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, at least, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14577259475 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86445782227 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629737609329 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0344719447 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.25 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.15 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260179877621 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067811879941 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531373437593 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164008842219 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501058740947 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, at least, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14577259475 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86445782227 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629737609329 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0344719447 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.25 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.15 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260179877621 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067811879941 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531373437593 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164008842219 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501058740947 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.