The bar chart shows the percentages of the UK workforce in five major industries in 1841 and 2011.
The bar chart gives an analysis in the ratio of the UK working section in five industry fields in 1941 and 2011. It is notable that services almost hold the topmost choice among the major industries in the two observed years.
Initially, the employee proportion of services is reported to have steeply escalated to 81% while this statistic just stood at 33% in the mid-nineteen century. Likewise, worker sharing in construction made up 5% and experienced a marginal upward tendency to 8% in 2011.
On the contrary, manufacturing which accounted for 36% of workers was the most worker-attracting in the UK during the 1840s. This figure witnessed a dramatic decline dropping by three-fourth in the early twenty-first century. Besides, the manpower ratio of agriculture/fishery and energy/water respectively took up 22% and 3% in 1841. However, both of the areas above ended up bottomed the chart with 1% in 2011.
In brief, despite the fluctuations of the grand industries, energy/water always took up the tiniest percentage of manpower in the given years.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | 89 | view |
- Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result people gravitate towards buying their products What problem does it cause What could be done to encourage people to buy local products 89
- The line graph shows estimated sales of gold in Dubai for 12 months in 2002 in millions of Dirhams 89
- Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result people gravitate towards buying their products What problem does it cause What could be done to encourage people to buy local products 78
- Many students now have the opportunity to study in other countries Studying abroad may bring some benefits to some students but it also has a significant number of disadvantages Discuss both sides of the argument and give your own opinion 89
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today What are the causes of global warming and what measures can governments and individuals take to tackle the issue 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, likewise, while, in brief, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24561403509 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25167233953 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654970760234 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.3877170909 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222932195064 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778217883228 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093004283445 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118027263148 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111967541805 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.