The pie charts below show the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK university in 1987 and 2007.
The given pie charts illustrate the information about the reasons that students chose before deciding to go to a UK university in the 2 years 1987 and 2007. Overall, the majority of students there considered a suitable degree course to be the main factor, and there was a tendency of students wanting to be close to their parents after 20 years.
According to the charts, 35% of the students studied at the university because of suitable degree courses in 1987, higher than the percentage of those who went to the university because of quality resources and sports/social activities by 14% and 16%, respectively. Much lower than these figures, quality of teaching and being close to parents only accounted for 15% and 10% of the reasons in 1987.
However, it can also be observed that two decades later, the proportion of students who wanted to be close to their parents increased to almost a quarter, whereas that of those who sought sports and social activities dropped to as low as 6%. Meanwhile, in comparison to the 8% of students choosing the quality of teaching of the university, twice as many chose the quality of resource in 2007.
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 100
- The chart below shows the number of passengers who used public transport in Somewhere town from 2012 to 2015 84
- The supplied diagram enumerates the amount of financial investment in research by the U S government from 1980 to 2008
- The charts below show the percentage of people aged 23 65 in different occupations in one UK town Ashby and in the UK as a whole in 2008 67
- What are the factors which are related to academic success in high-school students? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun chose seems to be countable; consider using: 'many choses'.
Suggestion: many choses
...of teaching of the university, twice as many chose the quality of resource in 2007.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, whereas, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85204081633 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72929618845 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545918367347 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.7559113225 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.5 112.824112599 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.6666666667 22.9334400587 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262616623494 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135556510255 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115815262363 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17941789569 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0914484385577 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.