Some people want academic subjects such as history and physics to be taught in secondary school. Others want practical skills such as mechanical and gardening to be taught. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Some people would like to learn more academical subjects such as history and physics before going to the society, while others think that learning practical skills such as mechanical and gardening is better. Both views will be discussed in this essay, and I opine that the latter is more persuasive.
On the one hand, there is an argument that studying written knowledge in high school is beneficial. First and foremost, helpful senses can be given by academic subjects in the long term. This is because we are able to acquire basic knowledge which is quite useful and demanding in our real life from the classroom. Consequently, we are likely to reach some point where the wisdom become used effectively. In addition, human being is expected to study academical knowledge in an early age time. Considering the fact that not having a study habit and aging make people difficult to learn written information, we have to expose ourselves into academic subjects earlier. Thus, the speed of attaining new things will be slow down.
On the other hand, there are severe reasons why practical subjects are demanded. Firstly, if people can be taught about mechanics or gardening in schools, they are able to be financially independant from their parents. By earning specific skills, it is undoubtedly that finding a job in a wide range of career field and saving money would be easier for them. Secondly, the capability of problem solving will be widened. For example, some hard work like fixing a car and managing house cannot be avoided. In this respect, practical subjects surely gurantee more convenient lifestyle.
In conclusion, although academic subjects are helpful in terms of aging to some extent, I belive that practical subjects can give us financial help which is far more beneficial.
- Many people believe that the increasing gap between rich and poor people has a negative impact on society What are the reasons for rising inequality and what problems could it cause 47
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and1995 and Austrailia s share of the Japanese tourists market Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below You should write at least 1 78
- Universities and colleges are now offering qualifications through distance learning from the Internet rather than teachers in the classroom Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The use of social media e g Facebook and Twitter is replacing face to face contact for many people in thier everyday life Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantage 56
- When a country develop its technology the traditional skills and ways of life die out It is pointless to try and keep them alive To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 713, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f attaining new things will be slow down On the other hand there are severe reaso...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96621621622 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52979866792 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60472972973 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 296.0 20.2975951904 1458% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1470.0 106.682146367 1378% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 296.0 20.7667163134 1425% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 136.0 7.06120827912 1926% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347020280831 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.347020280831 0.084324248473 412% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210681976815 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102485869861 0.056905535591 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 150.0 13.0946893788 1146% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -228.96 50.2224549098 -456% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 118.7 11.3001002004 1050% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.03 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 22.05 8.58950901804 257% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 55.0 9.78957915832 562% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 120.4 10.1190380762 1190% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 55.0 10.7795591182 510% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.