The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 to 2010. Summaries the information and make comparison where possible.
The bar graph below provides the data about three nations Tunsia, Japan and Ecuador gross domestic product growth per year from 2007 to 2010.
As an over all trend annual GDP growth increased in case of Japan, But quite opposite for Tunisia fell each year. While in Ecuador showed irregular changes.
In 2007 gross domestic product growth was 2 percent annually for Japan which rose more than double 4.2 percent in next year 2008. This increment follow each year and 2009 was 5.2 percent. However, peaked value was 6.4 percent in 2010, which was highest among other countries GDPs and also for Japan itself with comparison to previous years.
On the other hand Tunisia gross domestic product growth was 6.2 percent yearly in 2007, which was its mounted value among other coming years. While with in year this percentage showed drastic plunged and fall to 4.4 percent in 2008. And then with each passing years decrease 3.2 percent in 2009, slightly drop to 3 percent in 2010. While, in Ecuador GDP growth was about 3 percent in 2007 which increased to almost 5 percent in 2008, that was peaked value among other years. And in very next year 2009 its percentage dropped to least value 1.2 percent among other nations and with comparison with its own other years. However Ecuador lifted its GDP percentage to 2.2 in next year 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-09 | Farwa Nasir | 61 | view |
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the change in each category of export in 2016 compared to 2015 Summarise the information and make a comparison where possible 67
- Some people say that advertisement targeting children may have negative effects on them and suggest banning such advertisement as a solution To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- The chart below show the information about changalles people face when live in other countries Summaries the information by reporting main features and make comparison where possible 73
- the graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by reporting the main feature and make comparisons where posssible 73
- The bar charts below show the percentages of men and women in employment in three countries in 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r this percentage showed drastic plunged and fall to 44 percent in 2008 And then ...
^^
Line 4, column 516, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the least'.
Suggestion: to the least
...y next year 2009 its percentage dropped to least value 12 percent among other nations an...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1074.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66956521739 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.03316546664 2.65546596893 77% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460869565217 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 230.0 22.4926829268 1023% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1074.0 112.824112599 952% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 230.0 22.9334400587 1003% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 58.0 5.23603664747 1108% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221608429208 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.221608429208 0.103423049105 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163365331728 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333301138934 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 115.6 13.2329268293 874% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -136.59 61.2550243902 -223% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 89.5 10.3012195122 869% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.29 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 17.45 8.06136585366 216% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 52.0 11.4329268293 455% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 94.0 10.9970731707 855% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 94.0 11.0658536585 849% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.