some people believe it is better to study subjects that have practical applications. Others however think it is better to study subjects that are theoretical. discuss both views.
In the present, both practical and theory-based subjects are taught in schools. While some argue that it is better to teach more topics that have more practical applications, others state that there are more advantages in teaching more theory-based subjects. In this essay, both sides of the argument are discussed and justified as I believe that there are equal advantages in teaching both subjects.
There are many advantages associated with learning subjects that are heavily practical based. Developing skills and application in real life can be stated as the most outstanding advantages. When undertaking a subject matter that involves practical work, individuals are encouraged to develop skills such as patience, task initiation, organizational planning, emotional control, self-regulation, and efficacy. The tasks also allow students to participate in tasks as groups, providing them further opportunities to develop social skills as well as personal ones. By tackling various experiments throughout the course, individuals become familiar with how they can apply the skills they develop in real-life situations. For example, taking precautions when using bunsen burners in laboratories teach children to be careful when dealing with fire.
By learning theory-based subjects, the individuals are introduced to the science of why things happen. Using the same example from the previous chapter, we can explain why we need to be cautious when handling fire. When the skin comes to contact with fire, the first two layers of the skin- the epidermis and the dermis can be destroyed, causing severe pain. When learning the theory, a child has to involve their cognitive thinking to comprehend it. Hence this encourages them to develop skills such as critical thinking.
There are various subjects taught in school that involve practical and theory-based applications. I firmly believe that both of these components can work hand in hand and complement each other as they can develop all rounding skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-27 | noahumar | 84 | view |
| 2021-04-11 | nnnqqq | 56 | view |
| 2020-03-24 | Hector Padilla | 56 | view |
| 2018-12-28 | tahmeed1993 | 42 | view |
- Students should choose a university major that prepares them for a high paying career to what extent do you agree with this statement 67
- Behavior in schools is getting worse explain the causes of this problem and suggest some possible solutions 56
- the internet has changed the way we interact with each other now compared to in the past what re he advantages and disadvantages of this 56
- Nowadays people have greater access to fast food Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 89
- the internet has changed the way we interact with each other now compared to in the past what re he advantages and disadvantages of this 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 829, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ren to be careful when dealing with fire By learning theorybased subjects the ind...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 511, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...develop skills such as critical thinking There are various subjects taught in sch...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, so, well, while, as to, for example, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41558441558 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83090073793 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525974025974 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 308.0 20.2975951904 1517% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1668.0 106.682146367 1564% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 308.0 20.7667163134 1483% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 80.0 7.06120827912 1133% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204093789316 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.204093789316 0.084324248473 242% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139736756729 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0997816633298 0.056905535591 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 158.1 13.0946893788 1207% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -249.6 50.2224549098 -497% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 124.6 11.3001002004 1103% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.64 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 23.07 8.58950901804 269% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 63.0 9.78957915832 644% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 125.2 10.1190380762 1237% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 125.0 10.7795591182 1160% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.