The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition
The given statement tells us that the best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling them a sense of cooperation, not competition. This comes across as an overt generalization in which certain words have been used indiscriminately which significantly hampers the efficacy of the statement. The issue becomes extrapolative and subjective in nature as to why as a reader one can't agree with the sentiment expressed.
Firstly, the use of the word best way is problematic here. This claim doesn't draw any parallel comparison to an incident where instilling a sense of cooperation helped to prepare great leaders or doesn't provide any evidence in support of the claim that how instilling a sense of cooperation in young people is the best way. It could work for some people but not for everybody in general.
Additionally, cooperation plays an important role in the growth of young people. Cooperation helps to develop the understanding between the team and its leader but competition is what prepares young people for leadership in government, industry, or any other fields.
Furthermore, competition is what pushes an individual to perform better. A leader is someone who needs to be cooperative but a competitive spirit is what is required to become a great leader. If a leader is not competitive he will not be able to take his team to reach greater heights or motivate its members to keep performing better and better.
Thus, we can conclude that by ignoring so many important factors which are important for the assessment of the issue holistically, the issue becomes redundant in nature. On purely logical grounds, we can't agree with the sentiment expressed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | hainess25 | 70 | view |
| 2024-08-28 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-02 | MMoksha | 66 | view |
| 2024-06-30 | AkellaSrinivas | 66 | view |
- The following appeared as part of a recommendation from the financial planning office to the administration of Fern Valley University In the past few years Fern Valley University has suffered from a decline in both enrollments and admissions applications 70
- Write a response 53
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 50
- In any enterprise the process of making or doing something is ultimately more important than the final product Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above Support your point of view with reasons and or examples from 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 451, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ive in nature as to why as a reader one cant agree with the sentiment expressed. ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'word the best'.
Suggestion: word the best
...t expressed. Firstly, the use of the word best way is problematic here. This claim doe...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...est way is problematic here. This claim doesnt draw any parallel comparison to an inci...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...tion helped to prepare great leaders or doesnt provide any evidence in support of the ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 201, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...n nature. On purely logical grounds, we cant agree with the sentiment expressed.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, still, thus, as to, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 286.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11888111888 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08666607484 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541958041958 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4235465518 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.615384615 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42802489176 0.243740707755 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133997116904 0.0831039109588 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.164860378556 0.0758088955206 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21793937101 0.150359130593 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131784542674 0.0667264976115 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.