Is invention of robots fruitful or dangerous? Discuss advantages and disadvantages.
Nowadays, more and more robotic breakthroughs are manifested thanks to the fast-paced development in science. Some argue that such improvement causes significantly more detrimental outcomes than good ones, while the rest believe in the contradict. From my perspective, I agree with the latter opinion that the benefits of mechanical inventions have outweighed their cons.
First of all, there are many values that humans have gained from engineering robots. One of such advantages is the reduction of works for involved states and firms. To illustrate, by introducing automatic devices, businesses can allow the production process to be continuous without employee involvement thus decrease the time to generate goods. Another positive impact would be the enhancement of relevant and surrounding technologies. Because as productivity skyrockets, there would be a desire among corporation executives to utilize as many scientific inventions as possible, which enables them to stand out from the competition. In other words, scientists will be funded considerably to establish modern machines that help companies remain competitive in the market.
Apart from the discussed merits above, mechanics can deliver many impending harms. It is apparent that eventually most repetitive tasks would be automated by technologies, which leads to a dramatic soar in the unemployment rate. The manufacturing of automobiles, for instance, are witnessing an automation pinnacle. As a result, the number of instruments has surpassed that for human labour in terms of vehicle manufacture. Furthermore, inequality is inevitable because of wealth concentration for those who possess the patents. Whereas the rich would avail from the increment in productivity created by these machines, the poor would gradually lose incomes due to respective replacements.
In conclusion, advantages from mechanic devices are tremendous not only in terms of economy but also in terms of scientific innovation. However, to ensure equality among society, robotic cons should be taken into account at the same time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-17 | zanzendegi | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | nhub2409785 | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | nhatkhang111 | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Nhi3132006 | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 89
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 95
- Many people continue to use cars and motorcycles even though they know that they are bad for the environment Why this What can be done to reduce the use of these vehicles 83
- Some think the current generation should take steps to protect the environment for the next generation To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Many people work long hours leaving very little time for leisure activities Does this situation have more advantages or more disadvantages Give reason for your answer and include any relevant example from your own knowledge or experience 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 233, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...an good ones, while the rest believe in the contradict. From my perspective, I agree with the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, whereas, while, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77597402597 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19020065977 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672077922078 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.080304107 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.647058824 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1176470588 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94117647059 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0821200561356 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0227913870907 0.084324248473 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0276183869231 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0497792657382 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209446067206 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.