Many countries import large amount of food from other parts of the world. Is this a positive or negative development?
Numerous governments tend to fulfill their food bank by importing from other countries. Yet, the tendency has created a controversial topic in those communities as to discuss whether the government doing is benevolent or malevolent. Personally, I regard such policy as a disadvantage since importation demonstrates a sole fact that a country is lack in the sufficient conditions to provide its inhabitant with enough food.
To begin with, a country is forced to import when its population is rising at an incessant rate, and the situation is even exacerbated for smaller countries. For example, Singaporean have increased in quantities over the past few years due to the place's attractive living conditions. This has made the unprepared government purchase more food from the foreign to both satisfied the inhabitants and upkeep its livable trend. What makes this negative is that importation is overly expensive and hinders the authorities from allocating their budget for other social services. However, imported products lead to other consequences such as tax augment and much more expensive bills. Those factors would seem unfavorable to the citizen especially the immigrants, hence lead to their leaving the current country for another. Ultimately, the foreign bought consumptions will be left redundant once most people have chosen to live in other places.
Excessive importation is a sign of natural resources and farmland depletion. This is mostly caused by industrialization and modernization as the expansion for more industrial regions and man accommodations. These overtake the lands that are supposedly used for agricultural activities and farming. Furthermore, those areas might be not taken by the urban but are contaminated by industrial wastes. Consequently, the governments are to import food to prevent further hunger and crisis in the cities. However, the urban dwellers will have to suffer from both environmental contamination’s damage and the surprisingly high cost of livings. Additionally, I also reckon that if more countries are to used their lands to the point that domestic supplies become limited, a global crisis will occur. Africa’s suffering in the last two decades is the most likely example. Although the size of land there is enormous, the local leaders chose to mine ores and allow foreign companies to use the space and increased the country's revenues. This had left millions dead because crops and supplies were either not enough or of low quality.
Overall, a food-importing policy is much likely a negative trend and leads to several repercussions. Therefore, those leading individuals are to have considered policies to the problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-25 | rika205 | 61 | view |
| 2022-06-23 | rika205 | 61 | view |
| 2022-03-16 | Ngoc Trinh | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-16 | Ngoc Trinh | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-01 | minhlamnguyen1204 | 56 | view |
- Researching And Treating Diseases Is Too Costly So It Would Be Better To Invest In Preventive Measures 61
- In recent years online education is becoming more and more popular What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon Use specific details and examples to explain your opinion 11
- Some people store personal and private information online including banking contacts and addresses Is it a positive or negative trend 78
- Nowadays families move to different countries for work Some people think it has a negative effect on children while others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Nowadays families move to different countries for work Some people think it has a negative effect on children while others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2268.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 415.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46506024096 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13961756147 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595180722892 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 714.6 506.74238477 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0430586058 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.090909091 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8636363636 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215083597513 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587319040052 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583043347484 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131830492386 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383108068253 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 78.4519038076 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.