An increase in production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. What are the causes and possible solutions?
The environment is damaged by the overproduction of finished goods. This is predominantly because of increment in population and world turned towards materialistic nature but, there are several solutions which can be taken by the government.
Firstly the reason why manufacturing of consumer product is booming because of surge in population. This is to say that as the number of people increases their needs also increases and thereby the demand. Secondly peoples attitude towards the product and the service has changed in other words the people are becoming more materialistic so the people purchase the product only for showing off to the people. For instance, 30% of people buy over budget cars only seeing to their neighbours.
To take this paradigm, there are two effective solution of reducing the production of finished goods. One way is that government can force the manufacturers to produce reusable product by this the people could able to use the goods more than one time so individuals would avoid buying new products. Another method is about awareness of people. The government should teach the people about the environmental problems so that people would understand the damages which could happen to the environment if they use more product and they also start using eco-friendly product and start recycling to it.
In conclusion, even though, the making of consumer goods is increasing, the government’s efforts to force the manufacturing firms to make reusable products and teaching the people about environment problems are the effective dealing with the issue.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 73
- It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car a television and a fridge Do advantage of this development for society outweigh the advantage 73
- The number of old people is increasing in many countries Some people think this cause problems whilst other people think that old people have an important role to play how far do you agree or disagree 73
- The pie graphs below show the results of a survey of children s activities
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34262948207 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92412909153 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537848605578 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.813805443 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.909090909 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8181818182 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193361907484 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754777723282 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438677860094 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119481350696 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0126570671398 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.