The line graph illustrates the proportion of total expenditure in a certain European country between 1960 and 2000.
The line graph compares the percentage of total consumption in terms of different life aspects in an unspecified European nation in the years of 1960 and 2000.
Overall, the initial impressive from the chart is that apart spending on transportation showing a significant increase, all others experienced a downward trend in the proportion of expenses over the given period.
In 1960, food outnumbered in the amount of expenditure in comparison with others with nearly 35% expenses. The next rank belonged to Leisure approximately 20% followed by clothing (10%), transport (9%). Meanwhile, only 5% being an unnoticeable figure was spent on fuel/energy.
In the next 40 years, allocations for food incredibly showed a steady decline and by 2000 it was witnessed a more than twofold decrease by 15%. Especially, leisure, clothing and even fuel/energy also underwent the similar dropped trend, the spending on those classifications by 11%, 5%, and around 3% respectively. On the other hand, at the beginning expenses on means of transportation had in an insignificant figure, its allocations were the only one seeing a considerate increase to be on the top with 15%.
- The use of mobile phone should be banned in public places like libraries and shops To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
- The graph below shows the information about medical care in three Europe countries between 1980 and 2000 78
- The bar chart shows the types of media that people of different age group used to get daily news in one country in 2011 84
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 67
- The graph gives information about the percentage of people living in Australia who were born in Asia the UK and other regions 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e increase to be on the top with 15%.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31351351351 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24875207822 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.681081081081 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5268739547 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.875 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134845282748 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528604063791 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865187892571 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0936913355229 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102324698734 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.