The table below shows the results of survey in 2000 2005 and 2010 about one university

Essay topics:

The table below shows the results of survey in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university.

Submitted by sr102020 on Tue, 05/25/2021 - 12:03

The table given compares the proportion of good ratings given to five different aspects of one college over a span of 10 years, commencing from 2000. Overall, there was a rise in the number of students positively rating teaching quality, print and electronic resources, while there is a decline in the equivalent figure for the range of modules offered. It is also clear that the feedbacks for buildings/teaching facilities stayed unchanged throughout the period.
As is observed from the data, three of the given aspects’ figures experienced an upward trend. In 2000, print resources took the lead, with 87% of the students giving it good ratings. Despite a fluctuation, the figure finished at 88% at the end of the period, registering a 1% rise. Electronic resources, which had the second lowest level of postive feedbacks at the start, skyrocketed to 88% in 2010, becoming the most postively rated aspect. A noticable 65% percent of the student alloted good ratings to teaching quality in 2000, this figure grew to 69% in ten-year time.
By contrast, there is a decrease in the corresponding figure for the range of modules offered. It dived from 32% to 27% in 2010 , ranked the worst rated aspect. In the meantime, it was noticable that buildings/ teaching facilities’ figure remained stable, recording a significant 77% of the students giving the aspect good ratings over the period.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-05-25 sr102020 78 view
2020-12-04 necromancer2610 73 view
2020-11-01 necromancer2610 73 view
2020-10-11 marji view
2020-10-11 marji view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS General Training

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 557, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...quality in 2000, this figure grew to 69% in ten-year time. By contrast, there is...
^^
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ffered. It dived from 32% to 27% in 2010 , ranked the worst rated aspect. In the m...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 5.05154639175 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 32.9175257732 21% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 26.3917525773 144% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1167.0 937.175257732 125% => OK
No of words: 229.0 206.0 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.096069869 4.54256449028 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.78020617076 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90462443359 2.54303337028 114% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 127.690721649 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56768558952 0.622605031667 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 347.4 290.88556701 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.13402061856 44% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.2575730413 44.8134815571 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.090909091 76.5299724578 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 16.8248392259 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.45454545455 4.34317383033 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0645841554165 0.216113520407 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0260081094773 0.0766984524023 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341531559924 0.0603063233224 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0465388777655 0.12726935374 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170008240902 0.0580467560999 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 8.37731958763 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 70.7449484536 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 8.71597938144 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 7.59969072165 116% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 41.2886597938 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.