the adverse impacts of globalization on the cultural identity erosion
A topical issue in modern society is the adverse impacts of globalization. While a common opinion is that the cultural identity erosion has resulted from globalization, other people feel that globalization is a good chance for poor countries to develop. This essay will outline the reason why globalization can beacause of eroding traditions, and offer some measures to tackle with this issue.
From an overall perspective, there are two main reasons why traditional cultures has been destructed by globalization. Perhaps the main reason is the interest of young people in new cultures to show that they are modern and not boorish. Vietnamese wedding is a good case in point. Unlike in the past, Vietnamese brides todays prefer a Western style wedding dress instead of Ao Dai because of convenience and luxury. As a consequence, Ao Dai is sinked into oblivion and it will become rarely known as a traditional costume of Vietnam. A furthered point in favor of erosion is communication among corporations in the country, which can lead to the disappearance of dialects. This is because there are loads of investors who move to other countries to cooperate, which means they must use English as the Lingua Franca to communicate. That is a reason which lead to the rise in using English more than mother lounge. Especially, parents, who always want their children must be professional in English, think that it is not essential for their kids to know more about their mother language. That is because if children are good at English, they will be able to living or working abroad which provides them more job prospects and higher wages. As a result, there are many children are not capable of speaking their dialect.
Despite these arguments, there are a number of ways to resolve this issue. First and foremost, the cooperation between schools and parents should be required and strongly emphasized in order to educate young generation about how vital their culture is. To elaborate, children need to be capable of understanding why they should protect their traditions and customs first. They should be taught that if a country cannot preserve and keep up their national language, that country may be dominated by richer countries. In addition, the government ought to encourage citizens to use at least two languages. However, mother lounge is a compulsory one to make sure that it will not be forgotten. If individuals can combine their own language with another one, the consequence of this will be people not only keep the specific cultural identities of their homeland, but also enable to socialize with other nations.
In conclusion, it must be said that the impacts of globalization on the cultural traditions has become a complex issue with no easy solutions. All thing considered, I believe that, it is vital to educate residents about their responsibilities to protects the cultures and being sociable in other traditional values. If the government implements this policy, it will provide a better life for future generation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, while, at least, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 13.1623246493 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2541.0 1615.20841683 157% => OK
No of words: 498.0 315.596192385 158% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10240963855 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72397222731 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89622630407 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 176.041082164 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524096385542 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 805.5 506.74238477 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.512527393 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.875 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168390781981 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433158988638 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068373948219 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133538521468 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103873821037 0.056905535591 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.