Some people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries, shops, and on public transport. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Prohibiting mobile phone in some public location like libraries, shops or public transport nowadays is encouraged by many individuals. From my perspective, apart from some certain areas which are prone to auditory interference, others do not require this much quietness. Thus, I partly agree with this statement
On the one hand, mobile phone may deteriorate the atmosphere of public locations that highly valued tranquility due to its destructive nature . Specifically, many public areas are utilized because of their high level of quietness that can be helpful for intellectual activities. For instance, many students come to library because of its specific design which can ultimate concentration and productivity. As mobile phone can create a gigantic auditory inteference, they should never be used in such places
On the other hand, there are other places that mobile phones are still really essential. In detail, smart phone is not only a tool for communication but also really helpful in many other activities. For example, finding the shortest route while traveling on public transport is an ordinary activity that require mobile phone. Therefore, smartphone can not be totally banned in every public locations because of different level of tranquility each public places demand
To conclude, although this is still a controversial topic that many individuals still advocate to completely ban the utilization of mobile phone in public areas. I endore my partial agreement that is not necessary to ban mobile phone in all public locations since while there are some places prefer quiet environment, it is a compulsory part to use mobile phone in others
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 78
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 93
- The diagram shows the design of a modern landfill for household waste Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- In many countries a small number of people earn extremely high salaries Some people believe that this is good for the country but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level Discuss both these views and give your own opin 67
- the chart below compares the percentage of self employed workers in 5 nations from 1998 to 2008 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ranquility due to its destructive nature . Specifically, many public areas are uti...
^^
Line 3, column 315, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ies. For instance, many students come to library because of its specific design w...
^^
Line 3, column 507, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...they should never be used in such places On the other hand, there are other place...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 468, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of tranquility each public places demand To conclude, although this is still a co...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 372, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lsory part to use mobile phone in others
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, really, so, still, therefore, thus, while, apart from, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42692307692 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92536200152 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573076923077 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.8840926798 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.1 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361421664373 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145028257945 0.084324248473 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907616740433 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225988189433 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018716465745 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.