More people decided to have children in their later age than in the past. Why? Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages?
In recent times, it is apparent to state that there is an increasing number of people going into their parenthood later in life compared to how it was in the past. In this essay, the reason for this trend will be given and the outweighed drawbacks will be explained.
In the past, more children were living in a family when comparing to recent years because labor was an important part, especially in the countryside where farming and agriculture are on top of families' priorities. They need to have children to help them with the housework or the farming procedures.
Bearing infants at an older age can be beneficial. In terms of finance, people who have children early may have to carry more than one financial burden. Not only do they need to worry about paying bills but the food and clothes for the child are also what needed to be put on the priority list. Therefore, people who have children later in life have a higher chance of having enough money to accommodate their children's needs.
However, it is the drawbacks of this situation that outweighed the benefits. First, one of the aspects of a person that may be highly affected is health. Normally, people who have kids in their twenties have more strength to deal with a baby's problems like crying and instant need for toys or food. With this being compared to forties or middle-aged parents, those problems can be more annoyed, which can make parents stressed and are more likely to lose their temper. Moreover, having small children in their later age can be unbeneficial in the long term when they retire, but their children are still too small to take care of themselves and help you back.
Overall, although having kids later in life can be beneficial for the financial state, the benefits that parents with small kids can have may be overtaken by the drawbacks it has.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-13 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-22 | Diyorbek Zaripboyev | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-03 | Sayansh Garg | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-22 | Kaur_Aman | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-22 | Kaur_Aman | 73 | view |
- The table and chart shows data from a survey of library users 78
- The maps show the village park 10 years ago and the village car park now 77
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 82
- The plans show Ashford in 2010 and Ashford now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...weighed drawbacks will be explained. In the past, more children were living in ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74534161491 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45086745516 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524844720497 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5845112856 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.142857143 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332027016015 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115953426539 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072239403708 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178864413852 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811870118974 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 50.2224549098 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.