Some peole prefer to work on school projects with a group, while others would rather work alone. Discuss both views and give your opinioon.
Many people contend that completing school projects with a group help students to share knowledge among each other, while others believe that finishing school tasks alone assists in acquiring indepth knowledge of the subject. In my opinion, students should strive to complete the task alone and should reach out to their friends only if they need assistance to finish the task.
It is apparent that group studies often lead to new ideas and innovations. In school, students are provided with case studies that are either based upon real life situations or concerns that we encounter in our mundane life. In that sense, group studies assist students in finding multiple solutions to a given problem, and it flourishes healthy relationships and discussions. For instance, a discussion on environmental degradation can help numerous students to get aware of this enigma, and they build social skills and coordinate with each other. Also, when people work together, the task finishes really fast. Thus, working in a group can save a lot of time.
Despite the above argument, There are few ocassions when group projects are not beneficial to certain individuals. For instance, In a group of five people, while three students work hard enough to gather the information, the contribution of the remaining two students in the project is completely obsolete. Such behavior harms the entire group and often results in fights. Hence, several individuals prefer to complete the project alone. Furthermore, completeing a project alone not only helps in acquiring indepth knowledge of the subject, but it also helps in getting the work recognized and valued by the institution.
In my opinion, students, especially teenagers, should strive to complete a task on their own. Ofcourse, students should engage in group studies but being completely dependent on others to finish the project might have a few detrimental academic consequences in the future.
In conclusion, discussions helps people to broden their knowledge, but taking advantage of others skill to get away from completeing a task is incorrect. It must be left to individuals if they want to work in a group or study alone.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-04 | Mayuresh Patoliya | 73 | view |
- Some people today prefer to get advice for medical problems and do not want to visit a doctor Why is this Is this a positive or a negative development 73
- The chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000 56
- Some people today prefer to get advice for medical problems and do not want to visit a doctor Why is this Is this a positive or a negative development
- People have to spend more and more time to travel from their homes for jobs and study what are the reasons How can we solve this problem 67
- The table below gives information about the average annual spending of university students in three different countries 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, really, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1835.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25787965616 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8153841878 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541547277937 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3270901767 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.941176471 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5294117647 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232562967471 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078457997185 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491955780432 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133647232158 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443749991239 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.