The bar chart shows the percentage of the small, medium, large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016.
The bar graph compares the proportion of three groups of business like as small, medium and large companies which have social media presence for business purposes from 2012 to 2016.
Overall, we can see clearly that three different types of corporate firms tended to increase in the showtime. In addition, the most significant firm that used social media for business WAs large firm in the period.
In 2012, the large corporation that using social media accounted for 79% while the small and medium have only 28% and 31% respectively. From 2013 to 2014, although the big firm experienced a slow decline to under 5%, it still located on 1 st in all groups of firms that have a social media presence. In contrast, the two corporations that remain were tended to go up.
Between 2014 and 2015, all groups saw a decrease whereas the figure small and medium corporations recorded to almost 30%. In 2016, the group firm gone up especially the large corporations reached of peak to almost 80 %. Next, the small and medium were just a half.
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspaper or book because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extend do you agree or disagree this statement 84
- The chart and graph below give information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began 61
- Nowadays there is an tend that reports of media focus on problems and emergencies rather than a positive development Some people think it is harmful to individuals and society To what extent do you agree or diagree 61
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 60
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 33, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 2016. Overall, we can see clearly that three different types of corporate firms...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, still, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80446927374 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50788878797 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59217877095 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6778976598 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5555555556 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377650955972 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151920920779 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155293307084 0.0843802449381 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247615194562 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149145944647 0.0819641961636 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.