The graph below shows US consumers' average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010.
Write a report for a university, lecturer describing the information shown below.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart shows the average annual expenditures on cell and residential phone services of US consumers in the year 2001 to 2010. According to a Consumer Expenditure Survey conducted by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, cell phone services range from $200 to $800 while residential phones average from $400 to $700.
A significant increase of average cost can be seen for cell phone services starting from $200 in 2001. The price spiked by approximately $100 each year reaching $500 in 2005 and almost $800 in 2010.
The residential phone services however, started at a higher average cost of $700 in 2001 then slightly dropped annually reaching a similar cost with cell services in 2006 at a range of $500-$600. In 2010, it dropped at almost half of its cost in 2001 at $400.
The amount that the consumers spend on cell phone and residential phone services ranges almost the same, although it can be seen that residential phone services cost decreased as cell phone cost increased in recent years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-15 | smiley | view | |
| 2022-02-15 | smiley | view | |
| 2022-02-14 | smiley | view | |
| 2021-12-20 | ThuTruong2003 | 67 | view |
| 2021-11-29 | hollandnguyen | view |
- The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Some people feel that entertainers e g film stars pop musicians or sports stars are paid too much money Do you agree or disagree Which other types of jobs should be highly paid 61
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attractions in Britain in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80588235294 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68666449151 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470588235294 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9381841858 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.714285714 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272897899069 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177969179862 0.103423049105 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128321024762 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202209315923 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811090221252 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.