The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
The line graph illustrates the number of attendances going to a Caribbean island over the course of 7 years starting in 2010.
Looking at the line graph, it can be seen that all of the surveyed categories witnessed an upward trend in the number of visitors except for the figure of people staying on the island. However, it was the figure in this section that recorded a higher number than that of people being on cruise ships.
In particular, there were only 0.3 million of tourists choosing to stay in the ships in 2010. The figure then fluctuated flightly in the next 2 years before experiencing a steady increase in the subsequent years when it finanally reached 2 million people in 2017. Meanwhile, the number of visitors remaining on the island stayed unchanged in the first 2 years, at about 0.7 million, then it over doubled in 2013, at 1.5 million. After pleateuing out at this level for the next 2 years, the number fell slightly and regained its 2015’s level in 2017. Interestingly, the total number of visitors to Caribbean island experienced a two-stages rise from 1 to 3.5 in 2017, albeit with a year of stability in 2015 at around 2.7 million.
It can be seen that as twice the number of visitors staying on the island as that staying on the cruise ships in 2010. Throughout the surveyed period, the overall number for the former section still surpassed the latter.
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today
- Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals during festival periods people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
- Village of Chorleywood showing development between 1868 and 1994 78
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 73
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 48, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... at the line graph, it can be seen that all of the surveyed categories witnessed an upward...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, look, still, then, while, except for, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1145.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71193415638 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59071066323 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510288065844 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8935730203 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247347525482 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107027474018 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663198338023 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164032807576 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584175342646 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.