Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age, for driving cars or riding motorbikes. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that the most appropriate way to make road safety better is to increase the minimum legal age for utilizing means of transports such as cars and motorbikes. Although I admit that raising the minimum driving age is an effective method, I believe other solutions are much more significant.
On the one hand, I agree that it is useful to improve the minimum age of driving for several reasons. First of all, a large number of traffic accidents are caused mainly by young people. Because of their immaturity, they do not have enough perception to drive carefully. Thus, they will leave serious consequences to their lives and other people’s lives and also affect surrounding traffic such as traffic congestion. Furthermore, increasing the minimum legal age may somehow lessen the proportion of those people who have bad behavior such as running a red light, driving without a helmet, transgressing pavements and roadsides.
On the other hand, I would argue that there are still various methods to ensure road traffic safety since increasing minimum driving age is only advantageous to a certain extent. It is difficult to know whether those people are mature enough or not. One way of explaining this is that, nowadays, many students driving when they are yet old enough to participate in traffic. In spite of many warnings, those students still stubbornly disobey traffic laws. Therefore, instead of raising minimum driving age, the government must impose strict laws to manage traffic situation. Besides, traffic policemen should punish heavily those committing driving offenses and those in traffic without driving licenses. Last but not least, schools should also educate students about traffic to raise traffic safety awareness.
In conclusion, apart from increasing minimum legal age, there are some effective ways to improve road safety that can be done.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-08 | Bao Trang | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-14 | letrang250191 | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-08 | Bao Trang | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-08 | Bao Trang | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-08 | ZhangJiaYi | 56 | view |
- The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple producing countries in 2009 and 2019 and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019 78
- The chart shows British Emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below shows the spending in million dollars per household in the US on five different products in 2010 and 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the spending in million dollars per household in the US on five different products in 2010 and 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ving for several reasons. First of all, a large number of traffic accidents are caused mainly by ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, apart from, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66628330578 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573333333333 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6388405623 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.6 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4666666667 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306539697379 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106722870929 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0991396699435 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2237710271 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616858155897 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.