Computerized voting versus traditional
There is a debate on whether to use traditional voting versus computerized voting. The passage is talking about the disadvantages of the traditional way, specifically, the possibility of making a mistake in choosing the candidate name and the high cost of a recount if counting the vote by humans goes wrong. However, the lecturer disagrees by providing counterarguments for each of the points made by the author.
The professor points out that voting with computers might be easy for people who use them frequently and can afford them. However, less experienced people might decide not to vote because they either do not know how to use computers or are scared by them. Even though the author talks about how zoom-in and zoom-out and touch screen options in computers reduce the chances of human errors, using computerized voting can completely change the direction of voting if one does not know how to use it.
Additionally, the author discusses that people can make mistakes while counting the votes and if something goes wrong, they need to pay the high price of recounting, but the lecture argues that computer counting error can affect more than thousands of votes compared to few errors made by humans, furthermore, if the human made computers make such mistakes since no physical evidence is available recounting is not even an option.
Finally, the author brings his argument to a close by questioning that why government authorities who are comfortably trusting computers with their financial transactions and communicating risky information are not in favor of using computers for voting? The professor takes issue with this question by contending that the banking and social systems have been around for a while now and have been tested and debugged several times during several years since they are being used widely and frequently. Nevertheless, implementing a computer-based voting system will not be having a chance to get tested since it is only used every two years. Hence, it will not be flawless.
To sum up, the author and the lecturer have differing opinions about whether to apply technology and computers in voting systems or just stick with the traditional way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-14 | Pri_Judy | 81 | view |
| 2021-08-18 | talelaldabous | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-18 | talelaldabous | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-18 | talelaldabous | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-18 | talelaldabous | 78 | view |
- Computerized voting versus traditional 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement all jobs should provide some opportunity for physical exercise 83
- Print media including magazines and newspapers will be soon be completely replaced by internet news sources 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children over the age of 15 should be allowed to vote 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 268, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...t more than thousands of votes compared to few errors made by humans, furthermore,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, while, talking about, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1834.0 1373.03311258 134% => OK
No of words: 358.0 270.72406181 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12290502793 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83453359364 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 145.348785872 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550279329609 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 419.366225166 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 101.289189946 49.2860985944 206% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 152.833333333 110.228320801 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8333333333 21.698381199 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236970346546 0.272083759551 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108463435982 0.0996497079465 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150306531209 0.0662205650399 227% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147456046634 0.162205337803 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105648838145 0.0443174109184 238% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.3589403974 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.8541721854 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 63.6247240618 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.