It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job
Over the past few decades, the issue of whether or not it is more beneficial for children to work in the field of their parents' job rather than having a job that is very different from their family job has received a great deal of attention from young people and sociologists. Although some may say that by working hard, any person can be successful in any job; I as well as many others, believe that people who choose a job that is similar to their parents' job could become prosperous sooner and easier than others.
First of all, an important reason why working in parents' field is better for children is that they can learn many subjects from their parents. It is common for children who choose their family job to star working under the management of their parents in younger ages. This situation as well as bringing them a precious opportunity to learn the fundamental aspects of that job from their parents, helps them to gain a lot of experiences. Thus, these children are more likely to be successful in future.
Another reason for this point of view is that in many cases parents have paved the way of prosperity for their children. Many experts mention that there is a large range of obstacles for ones who are starting a new job. When a child choose their parent's job, he or she does not have to struggle with problems like these because their parents have solved these difficulties for them. For example, a company manager, who is managing his or her parent’s company, instead of trying to found a company or construct a building and buy machines, just have to manage the work routine of the company and try to expand their profit.
Finally, it is occasionally said that choosing parents' job is better because children could exploit the credit and the popularity of their family name. In many jobs having the credit among other co-workers or being prominent among the customers can cause rapid promotion and development. For instance, when your family own a famous brand, you do not need to try for finding a position in the market because you already have it.
In conclusion, considering the ideas presented in the paragraphs above, I personally believe that it is better for children to choose their parents' job than different ones chiefly due to better chance for prosperity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-19 | Umme Abiha | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | Umme Abiha | 66 | view |
| 2022-12-15 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 66 | view |
| 2022-12-15 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 66 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | nida fatima | 71 | view |
- In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives 73
- TPO-25 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- TPO 21 80
- In order to stay healthy, many people choose to exercise. Some people tend to exercise individually such as running and riding bicycles, etc. Some people tend to participate in group exercises such as team sports. Which one do you prefer and why? 70
- Many filmmakers make movies based on books. When a movie is produced based on books, some people prefer to read books before watching films, other people choose to watch the movie first. Which one do you think is better? Why? 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...Over the past few decades, the issue of whether or not it is more beneficial for children to w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 491, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ildren are more likely to be successful in future. Another reason for this point of view...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, may, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1897.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7425 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51107422232 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5025 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.8183732538 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.5 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5714285714 20.6045352989 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 5.45110844103 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.609657897151 0.236089414692 258% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.233319726647 0.076458572812 305% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152929343138 0.0737576698707 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.391796592011 0.150856017488 260% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109608980856 0.0645574589148 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 58.1214874552 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.002688172 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.