The diagram below shows a possible future means of home energy production
The graph illustrates the procedural stages of energy making for home use with waste as its principal source. With this self-produced energy, we do not, later on, have to buy conventional power for daily needs.
In the nutshell, the generation involves six primary sequences with composting process as the starter and electricity storage as the closer prior to electricity distribution to houses for daily uses.
Three initial steps have to be carried out before the gas is ready to be combusted. First of all, leaves, foods, scraps, and water fill in a composting tank; However, the materials cannot exceed ¾ of the total tank volume. The mixture will allow a fermentation process to occur, thus resulting in methane gas used as a basic ingredient for the next steps. Then, the methane gas is passed through to an ample methane gas storage before being funnelled into a compressor.
In addition to the three earlier steps, the compressed methane gas, as a result of the previous compression stage, needs incinerating in a combustion engine to convert the methane into mechanical energy. Furthermore, compared to the previous energy conversion step, the next step has the same purpose, but it yields a different sort of energy. The conversion process, carried out in a generator, turns the mechanical to electrical energy and the energy has to be stored first in a battery. Finally, the energy can be distributed to electrify houses for home use.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view |
- The graph below gives information about how much people in the United States and the United Kingdom spend on fuel
- The diagram below shows a possible future means of home energy production 11
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 84
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2005 2010 and 2015 about McGill University Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 95
- The diagram below shows a possible future means of home energy production 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, then, thus, as to, in addition, sort of, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1214.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07949790795 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84795582849 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585774058577 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0936919257 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.363636364 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7272727273 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6363636364 5.23603664747 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0685343693592 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0322802078807 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458278040556 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0407098680255 0.15604864568 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431167297746 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Are you sure that this essay…
Are you sure that this essay only received 1 out of 9?
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, then, thus, as to, in addition, sort of, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1214.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07949790795 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84795582849 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585774058577 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0936919257 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.363636364 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7272727273 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6363636364 5.23603664747 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0685343693592 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0322802078807 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458278040556 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0407098680255 0.15604864568 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431167297746 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.