In many countries, people like to eat a wider variety of food than can be grown in the local area. As a result, much of the food today we eat has to come from other regions.
Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
It is true that people from many parts of the world are having meals with a large proportion of important food. From my perspective, the disadvantages are overshadowed by its disadvantages.
When people eat more outland items, one problem which can be anticipated is that those items are more expensive than the local ones. In other words, because of transportation and the preservation process, the prices are forced to rise. For example, rice harvested from fields costs the locals less than when it is exported as the distance is a considerable problem. What can be inferred from this is that if people consume food from other regions, they must accept the fact that it necessitates them to pay more than usual.
Despite the aforementioned disadvantage, I am of the opinion that the advantages have a more significant bearing. One merit is that the trend broadens one’s horizons about other cuisines. To be specific, each place has its own agricultural methods, thus making food more appealing; as a result, people can improve their meals’ qualities. Another worth-mentioning benefit is that a wider range of food means more nutritions; on the other hand, food grown locally only has limited nourishment. Consequently, outline food can compensate for the inefficiency of local ones. People from the upper areas of the mountains only grow plants that are suitable for the cold weather; therefore, they have to order products which have a propensity for developing in high temperatures, such as corn and tomatoes. This directly suggests that the idea is beneficial for people’s health.
In conclusion, although outside food works wonders for people’s health conditions and battle shapes one’s recognition of the world, it possesses a significantly higher price. However, the disadvantages pale in comparison to the advantages.
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Lectures were used as a main method of teaching for the greater number of students in the past With the existing technology there is no longer any justification for that method To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In some countries more and more adults are living with their parents after graduating from college University or even after finding a job Do the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 89
- The pie charts indicate changes in the proportions of energy produced in a country from 1983 to 2003 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 37
- Some people think that children should start formal education at schools as early as possible others feel that the children should go to schools when they are at least seven years old Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3264604811 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09934393927 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611683848797 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0280899982 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.333333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325953076467 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958566933466 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590455051108 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175134708167 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066381479562 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.