Many parts of the world are losing important natural resources, such as forests, animals, or clean water. Choose one resource that is disappearing and explain why it needs to be saved. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Some generations ago, runing out of natural resources of our planet was no more than a myth. However, we are wittnessing that the woods, wildlife habitats, and fresh water are being used up on a large scale. This essay will outline how crucial it is to presrve clean watter for us and also for next generations.
To begin with, it must be stated that this phenomenon has a number of causes. Firstly, Overpopulation that is growing rapidly, specially in developing countries, makes it difficult for governments to provide clean water for them. In other words, the more people are born, the less amount of drinkable water will be distributed amoung them; therefore, the result would devastating. Secondly, using outdated agricultural equipments in many countries, leads to overusing natural water of those regions, and in turn, farmers have to exploit more lands with more usage of clean water to produce more. Finally, climate changing during the past decade, due to the greenhouse gases in the atmosphier, has given rise to shortage of water in many teretories. For instance, In the Middle East, which is located in the vast desserts, it does not rain as it used to do. Moreover, in these areas, legislatores have built various dims in the way of rivers. Although they help to reserve water for the latter use, they, however, make the rivers dry throughout passing of time.
A possible resolution that can ameliarate the status que is that governments should impose restricted rules on having children more than a specific number, overusing sweet water, and producing electric cars. To be more precise, when birth rates are controlled, when there are advanced farming machins available to the majority of farmers across the world, and lastly, when there is no excessive carbon dyocsid emitted into the air to warm the atmosphier, and also electric cars’ production is expedited, we can be hopefull that this major conundrum can be dealt with successfully.
In conclusion, the time to act is now. There is no room for complacency. Prompt and smart moves can improve the situation. Otherwise, future generations will condemn us for our ignorance and reluctance towards natural resources of the only habitable planet in the univerce, the Earth.
- Having a good university guarantees people a good job To what extent do you agree 89
- Smoking not only harms smokers but also those who are nearby Therefore smoking should be banned in public places To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In 1975 a wildlife census found that there were seven species of amphibians in Xanadu National Park with abundant numbers of each species However in 2002 only four species of amphibians were observed in the park and the numbers of each species were drasti 83
- Smoking not only harms smokers but also those who are nearby Therefore smoking should be banned in public places To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people believe that climate change has the greatest effect on people s way of life Others believe the economy of the region has the greatest effect Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 369, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'devastate'
Suggestion: devastate
...moung them; therefore, the result would devastating. Secondly, using outdated agricultural ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1886.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11111111111 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75121278517 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60433604336 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.4304988795 49.4020404114 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.941176471 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7058823529 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.29411764706 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148411994123 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0410673465038 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0306058263648 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0851653526673 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293568069713 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.