In some countries, young people have become richer, healthier, and live longer, but they are less happy. What are the causes? What can be done to address this situation?
There is no doubt that, in the past few years, the youngsters of some part over the world have the capacity of sustainable finance and more fortunate as well as longer lives. However, unfortunately, they do not seem joyful and happiness. In this essay, I will discuss some of the potential reasons regarding this matter and present some feasible solutions that help them minimize them.
In this day and age, the most significant problem, is the busy life-style that the youth of today have. Devoting their entire time to chase their dream, an ambitious job gives them no space to relax and concentrate on taking care themselves. Due to immersing themselves in overloaded works to make ends meet every single day, this make them unlikely take a short or even a long journey to enjoy intriguing and breath-taking sceneries. Moreover, they are focusing on education and careers, leading them suffer weak human relationships. That is to say, no real connections to be built in the rush of their lives. To illustrate this points, youth travelling for work or study, tend to loose connections with their families and friends. More precisely, they are not able to allocate their time to be with their loved ones through thick and thin.
To solve the aforementioned problems, they have to make time bond with their loved ones and enjoys little things. More importantly, they should control how much they spend their days on the internet and set certain limits for spans wasted on browsing social networking sites. To be exact, they should change their thought with respect timetable so that they can balance between duration of work or study and spans for themselves. As a result, they will be happier, brighter and this will sharpen their inner peace and gives them satisfaction.
In conclusion, it is the responsibilities of overload tasks and the fast space of life to tackle these issues. Hence, they can take a consideration by employing solutions provided above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-30 | MEBC Class | 100 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | QuynhAnh. | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | QuynhAnh. | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | Zeroplague0407 | 73 | view |
- The use of mobile phone should be banned in public places like libraries and shops To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
- The table shows the export values of various products in 2009 and 2010 84
- Many countries import a large amount of food from other parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development 84
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 67
- The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium and large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 and 2016 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...appiness. In this essay, I will discuss some of the potential reasons regarding this matter...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 683, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[3]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...h travelling for work or study, tend to loose connections with their families and fri...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by employing solutions provided above.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, well, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result, as well as, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73510106044 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59756097561 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6718989542 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.5 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14168921018 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495579718292 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0290317486101 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0901892135801 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325489646937 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.