Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology is now replacing their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In modern society, there are widely different schools of thought on the issue of whether the expenditure on maintenance of public libraries is no longer necessary since the avance technology can supersede its function. In my point of view, I am opposed to such an idea due to ample justifications.
First and foremost, documents in state - run libraries enable readers to approach reliable knowledge, which the internet cannot. This is attributable to publisher's attempts to protect their reputation by providing censored, sorted and updated information which is of enormous use for academic researchs. In contrast, the quality of online content that we could find is not ensured; therefore, people can access overstated and fake news, leading to unexpected conflicts or severe consequences. For example, there are numerous forums share about medicine treatment. However users do not have to be responsible for what they say, they supply inaccurate or even wrong information causing severe health problems for receivers.
In addition, libraries offer an ideal environment for working or studying. By investing a large amount of money in public reading - rooms, they become great places with adequate infrastructures for people to handle their tasks. This is really convenient for residents who have to live in hot and small rooms that make people uncomfortable to carry out their duties. In addition, the quiet atmosphere in the libraries can give us a perfect sense of concentration and foster our creativity; hence, it could facilitate improvements in overall effectiveness. Meanwhile, online platform users tend to be distracted by notification from social media and other applications, leading to lower productivity.
In summary, although the edge - cutting technology brings many advantages, public own merits. It is essential for governments to develop both of them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-11 | maiphuong0610 | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-11 | maiphuong0610 | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-10 | nhile1001 | 92 | view |
- Some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature of their own country than other countries Do you agree or disagree 78
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology is now replacing their functions To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 92
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and can even be damaging Do you agree or disagree 61
- The best way to reduce youth crimes is to educate their parents with parental skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...forums share about medicine treatment. However users do not have to be responsible for...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, really, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in contrast, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54006968641 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12151827444 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.686411149826 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3062069198 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.571428571 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144971928055 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404877893224 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411168388353 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0807380202876 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230826108323 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.