The table below shows the expenditures of four car companies on advertising in the UK in 2002

Essay topics:

The table below shows the expenditures of four car companies on advertising in the UK in 2002.

The table chart gives information about the amount of money which spend on advertising four distinct car brands in the UK in 2002.
Overall, it is clear that TV commercial was most popular advertising format by all four car companies, while there was an opposite trend which could be seen in cinema and outdoor. Besides, Renault spent the largest amount of money on advertising during 2002.
In 2002, Cetirizine stood at tops the list expenditure on the TV commercial, at 70 million dollars, while the figure for Vauxhall was slightly lower, at 65 million dollars. Next came Renault and Rover with figures 59 million dollars and 45 million dollars respectively. In terms of press advertising, the amount of money spent by Renault was largest, at about 45 million dollars, which was a little higher than that of Rover, at 38 million dollars. By contrast, the expenditure of Vauxhall and Cetirizine accounted for the lowest position, at $8 million and $12 million in turn.
Of the other forms, the advertising spending on the radio of four car manufacturers was equal, with 15 million dollars each. Meanwhile, advertising in cinema and outdoor was the format having the lowest investment, with less than $10 million spent by each company.

Votes
Average: 8.7 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-04-19 sammixmht10 view
2022-02-20 thanhtam2709 82 view
2021-10-11 haohao 76 view
2021-08-31 Louisa_Nguyễn 67 view
2021-07-13 Tienanh99 73 view
Essays by user Tienanh99 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 542, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ne accounted for the lowest position, at million and 2 million in turn. Of the o...
^^
Line 3, column 544, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... accounted for the lowest position, at million and 2 million in turn. Of the other fo...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0243902439 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73456296732 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531707317073 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6191450453 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.444444444 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.55555555556 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174996910131 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919928897137 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924006306766 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15508437407 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102637767593 0.0819641961636 125% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.