the maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010
The pictures illustrate how the village called Stokeford had been renovated from 1930 to 2010
Overall, it is apparent that farmland accounted for most of the village as well as few houses were built in Stokeford in 1930. However, throughout a period of 80 years, this village became more modernized and residential
In 1930, Stokefold consisted of 2 areas for agricultural activities, which were in the southwest and the northeast, along with a post office, a primary school, and shops. In the southeast of the map was situated a large house together with gardens. There was a river called Stoke running through the site and a main road connected these facilities and separated Stokeford into two sides
By 2010, with regard to accommodation systems, farmland, gardens, and shops had been demolished to make way for new blocks of flats on the eastern banks of the river. More streets were erected in terms of the transport network, branching off the major road to provide access to newly-built houses which were also lengthened along the leading road and parallel to the Stoke River. Meanwhile, the large house had been broadened and converted into a retirement home. In close proximity to the nursing home, the grade school’s size had doubled throughout the period surveyed. Moreover, the post office directly opposite the elementary school through the road remained intact
- the bar chart illustrate the number of tourists visit London museums 89
- The charts compare the proportion of energy produced by different sources in France in 1995 and 2005 78
- The pie charts below show the differences in how people in 3 countries learned English in 2010 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The maps demonstrate how the center of Islip town are planned to change 73
- The chart shows the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 365, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... along the leading road and parallel to the Stoke River. Meanwhile, the large house had b...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 469, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...nd converted into a retirement home. In close proximity to the nursing home, the grade school’s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, moreover, so, then, well, while, as for, as well as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1164.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17333333333 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69173403195 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617777777778 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.8328319402 43.030603864 197% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.5 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.125 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 5.23603664747 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17234550854 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656996554477 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0989720283504 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143877691866 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0985851997074 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.