Some people believe that it is better to build new museum and town hall instead of renovating the old ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree. Give your opinion and relevant examples.
Historical museum play a phenomenal role in order to broaden the origin of knowledge or masses. Presently, some proportion of masses assert that it is a lucrative idea to construct the new museum and town hall rather than doing maintenance of old premises. Here, I would like to discord with the given statement.
There are multifarious points to show up my point of view. First and foremost, construction of new museum and hall put adverse effect on financial budget of a nation. To demonstrate, in some thriving Nations administration have to spend money on other important sectors such as education, medical and transports; therefore, it seems herculean task for governing to construct a new museum and halls as it requires a astronomical outlays. On the other hand, maintenance of old museum and holes can be done in low budget. Consequently, government of a nation do not need to borrow money from other nation in order to renovating the old ones.
Further emphasizing on my point of view. Constructing new museum and Halls can be mitigate the attraction of visitors towards historical places. For instance, youngblood are interested to watch old forts and things. They have tendency to explore the old places so that they can get some knowledge of history. Moreover, watching old buildings and museum provides a great deal of adventure and amusement. The interest of visitors can be disappeared if government of nation built the new museum. Hence, modern generation will not get knowledge about past when new museum and building are constructed.
To recapitulate, undeniable, constructing new buildings has few positive outcomes. However, what benefits we would miss in the absence of renovating old ones is something we should think about it. In my opinion, maintenance of old museum has more pros than build new ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-23 | gagan_bajwa | 61 | view |
- Some people think that government should provide subsidy to the farmers for producing cheap and healthy food Others think that government should tax the company producing unhealthy food Discuss both view and give your opinion 92
- The days many people do little or no exercise at all and they have health problems as a result Why do not many people get enough exercise what can be done about it 78
- Some people believe that it is better to build new museum and town hall instead of renovating the old ones To what extent do you agree or disagree Give your opinion and relevant examples 61
- Nowadays many people with families leave their country to work abroad What are benefits and drawbacks of this Trend Give your opinion and include any relevant example 89
- Some people think that administration should spend money in cultural event and historical site However other claim that government should invest on some other important things discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...t a new museum and halls as it requires a astronomical outlays. On the other hand...
^
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'outlay'?
Suggestion: outlay
...and halls as it requires a astronomical outlays. On the other hand, maintenance of old ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...in order to renovating the old ones. Further emphasizing on my point of view. Constr...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13712374582 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9883761941 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56856187291 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.6607365743 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3333333333 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6111111111 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72222222222 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255959276438 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785842418385 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545143555335 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164957612553 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284596349921 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.