It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.). There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, there’s a multitude of debates about the role of human being in numerous species’ extinction with two main prominent notions. A number of people opine that it’s only a part of natural process while the rest advocate the opposite view. From my own perspective, the former one is legitimate for the past only, when human are not the driving force of decimation.
Since time immemorial, there has been massive extinction leading to colossal dying out of such species as dinosaur, dodos, mammoth, to name a few, whose culprit is natural elements like cataclysm in the case of dinosaur. Moreover, these so-called cruel, inhumane phenomena are crucial to maintain natural equilibrium. If animals can adapt to alien environment, their relatives, consequently will prosper, or else they’ll perish and culminate in a horrendous result. This contributes to the natural selection process to glean the most appropriate genes, that are capable of contending with hostile situations.
However, mankind impressively has made profound progress in evolution and no longer at the mercy of natural selection. Our activities, undoubtfully, have gigantic repercussion for the environment, extinction is of no exception. To illustrate, to cater to the looming dwelling crisis, production has stripped bare sections of the earth, decimating natural habitats and plunging thousands of species to the brink of annihilation. Moreover, insatiable avarice to fulfill unscientific gratification has put the end for the long-lasting history of vulnerable species. Therefore, human, taking the responsibility to prevent this is not an option but an obligation. In addition, there’s are a plethora of effortless ways to curtail the effect of our society and preserve species. If we unanimously committed to moderate conservation, the Mother nature won’t be heart-broken of impotently witnessing her child vanishing into nothingness.
In conclusion, even though we were not to blame for past extinction, the current industrial influence means we ought to take great responsibility to conserve biodiversity. Once a species dies out, it will never return.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-21 | sangeeth28 | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-23 | sangeeth28 | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-30 | Mphthao | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-24 | leanguyen | 89 | view |
- The maps below shows the town of Lynnfield in 1936 and then later in 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Popular events like the football world cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- The table below illustrates weekly consumption by age group of dairy products in a European country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graphs below show the cinema attandance in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Movies and computer games containing violence are popular Some people say they have a negative effect on society and should be censored Others say they are just harmless relaxation Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1828.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64197530864 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22195022739 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672839506173 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.72238328 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.25 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208449373222 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541995683122 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316974724189 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105780007214 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385019611219 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.82 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.