some people think that government should spend money to protect the wild animals which are endangered but others think that extinction of wild animals is a natural phenomena and thus government should not waste money. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Many believe that the reason of extinction of some species is people who pollute the nature. Thus, they consider that governments should care about the issue. however, some are sure this trend is a natural process that does not require much attention. The essay will describe both opinions before the author's.
To start with, nowadays the urbanisation in the world is in the peak of its development. however, people use an enormous amount of natural resources which are vital for normal life of wild animals. A typical example of this can be disappearing of forests which is for providing people with wood. As a result, the natural environment of forest habitans is destroyed. Moreover, the biggest proportion of air and water pollution is caused by humans. We lost more than half of fish types because of litter and dangerous liquids such as oils and different chemicals that contaminate the place of marine life. So, big part of this trend is fault of people and it is better for governments to avoid its further development.
On the other hand, human is not even somehow related to extinction of some particular species like dinosaurs or big mammals. Most of died out because of global ice age which is not the result of human activity. There are some cases when the evolution might lead to extinction. For example, the pterodactyls on that process changed into ordinary pigeons. Thus,many believe that this trend is not a problem at all.
in conclusion, even though natural process of evolution exists, I consider that the pollution is the mair reason of extinction of some wild species.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-07 | mrinal | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-28 | jasminabts | 61 | view |
| 2019-03-27 | Sutriani | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-27 | Sutriani | 67 | view |
| 2018-06-22 | Ranjit Singh | 92 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...overnments should care about the issue. however, some are sure this trend is a natural ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 311, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cribe both opinions before the authors. To start with, nowadays the urbanisation...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...orld is in the peak of its development. however, people use an enormous amount of natur...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , many
...cess changed into ordinary pigeons. Thus,many believe that this trend is not a proble...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
... this trend is not a problem at all. in conclusion, even though natural process...
^^
Line 7, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...son of extinction of some wild species.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, thus, even so, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95167286245 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.645524087 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591078066914 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4566081379 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.3529411765 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8235294118 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.29411764706 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177559298184 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049850507765 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448327480528 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109686589076 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352716535414 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.