Q16 Research says more and more business traning and business meeting are taking place online Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages

Essay topics:

Q16 : Research says more and more business traning and business meeting are taking place online. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

Recently, whether an increase in online meetings and sessions for employees is beneficial has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that although there are some advantages to participating in business meetings on the Internet, these are outweighed by the disadvantages, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I wholeheartedly agree with the former stance. In the following essay, both views will be discussed before a conclusion is reached with my opinion.

On the one hand, those who claim that workers can benefit a great deal from partaking in online meetings and training sessions do so for several reasons. Proponents of this argument insist that the development of technology has revolutionised the way people can take part in business meetings regardless of time and place as having access to the Internet is only needed. Furthermore, they are able to save time considering that commuting to and from work deprives them of a huge amount of time that would otherwise be spent on their work.

My opinion, however, is that holding online meetings for workers brings with it negatives. Perhaps the principal disadvantage is that online meetings prevent working adults from receiving instant feedback from their colleagues, leading them to have difficulty concentrating on their meetings. In other words, a large number of working people are more likely to struggle to have a tight grasp of their duties, which can even exert a detrimental influence on their work performance. In addition, to provide a hypothetical example, if it were not for face-to-face meetings for employees, it would be nearly impossible for them to build a strong relationship with co-workers as well as senior managers helping them to develop interpersonal skills that will be invaluable in their future careers. To be more specific, mingling with others at the workplace enables them not only to feel a sense of belonging but also to strengthen their bonds. In light of the above, I find these more persuasive.

In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that the drawbacks of attending business meetings on the Internet surpass the benefits for the reasons discussed above.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-08-09 idid382021 73 view
2022-08-09 idid382021 73 view
2022-08-07 idid382021 67 view
2022-08-04 hellielts 73 view
2021-09-23 LUCIALUSO 84 view
Essays by user idid382003 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 310, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ting on their meetings. In other words, a large number of working people are more likely to strug...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that the draw...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, then, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1942.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24864864865 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94852354381 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567567567568 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.854734728 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.466666667 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186739304597 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587527447379 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475167541295 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103918824647 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221654717145 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.