The usage of oil in four different countries between 1966 and 2006 as a percentage of total energy use within each nation
The line graph shows that the percentage of oil consumption in Iceland, Sweden, Italy, Turkey from 1966 to 2006 as the proportion of each nation’s total energy usage.
Overall, it is clear that Turkey’s oil usage proportion definitely increase, while the other 3 nations mentioned in the graph inclined to go down during the period. Meanwhile, the rate of oil usage in Italy remained relative consistent, but Sweden and Iceland’s percentage slumped.
Looking at the line graph more closely, one can see that Turkey began the race as the lowest rate of oil usage nation, but to 2006 it stood out as the most oil consumption rate at 90 percent, which closely to Italy’s oil usage at the same time. Italy’s proportion consistently high maintained a share of oil, between 80 percent and 90 percent, throughout the period. In contrast, Sweden and Iceland’s rate of oil suffered a significant decrease by approximately 40 percent during the first half of the period. Iceland experienced a slight up in 1996 then hit a low of 20 percent in 2006, whilst Sweden’s oil usage percentage continually plunged to approximate 30 percent throughout the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-06 | jadenguyen | 82 | view |
| 2022-06-06 | jadenguyen | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-21 | minhpn | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-29 | Tôn Nguyễn Hồng Phúc | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-13 | yeu192 | 69 | view |
- the population of Chile by age group between 1975 and 2035 79
- The diagrams show the stages in the production of yoghurt 92
- the information about the economic value of international students in the US in 2005 2010 and 2015 The bar graph shows changes in the number of international students from 3 countries in two of those years 73
- The difference in the Internet users in three different countries and the world average between 1998 and 2013 67
- The developments along Olive Drive before and after the construction of new facilities between 1980 and 2010 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05154639175 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90388783631 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572164948454 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.3017764109 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.0 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258482497542 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130133892784 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082761049226 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210501193896 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732526708444 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.