Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Climate change represents a major threat to life on Earth, but some people argue that we need to accept it rather than try to stop it. I completely disagree with this opinion, because I believe that we still have time to tackle this issue and reduce the human impact on the Earth's climate.
There are various measures that governments and individuals could take to prevent, or at least mitigate, climate change. Governments could introduce laws to limit the carbon dioxide emissions that lead to global warming. They could impose “green taxes” on drivers, airline companies and other polluters, and they could invest in renewable energy production from solar, wind or water power. As individuals, we should also try to limit our contribution to climate change, by becoming more energy efficient, by flying less, and by using bicycles and public transport. Furthermore, the public can affect the actions of governments by voting for politicians who propose to tackle climate change, rather than for those who would prefer to ignore it.
If instead of taking the above measures we simply try to live with climate change, I believe that the consequences will be disastrous. To give just one example, I am not optimistic that we would be able to cope with even a small rise in sea levels. Millions of people would be displaced by flooding, particularly in countries that do not have the means to safeguard low-lying areas. These people would lose their homes and their jobs, and they would be forced to migrate to nearby cities or perhaps to other countries. The potential for human suffering would be huge, and it is likely that we would see outbreaks of disease and famine, as well as increased homelessness and poverty.
In conclusion, it is clear to me that we must address the problem of climate change, and I disagree with those who argue that we can find ways to live with it.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-10-02 | Amarul Azmi | 78 | view |
2023-08-25 | Nhun Nhun | 84 | view |
2023-05-29 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
2022-12-15 | bnhanh02 | 87 | view |
2022-10-29 | Hangphan02 | 73 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007 73
- In recent years the structure of a family and the role of its members are gradually changing What kinds of changes can occur Do you think these changes are positive and negative 73
- The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013 73
- Big salary is more important than job satisfaction To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people say that schools should concentrate on teaching students academic subjects that will be useful for their future careers Other people say that subjects such as music and sports are also necessary Discuss both view and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...not receive unanimous approval from the worlds population. This is because methods to ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1910.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 381.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01312335958 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47022765115 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535433070866 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7746465425 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.375 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8125 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285531583367 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10151111332 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702325191149 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195649376149 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425118670284 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.