The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009; the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period.
Write a description of the two graphs and make comparisons with at least 150 words.
The first diagram illustrates the percentage of commuters using train service from 2000 to 2009, and the second line graph indicates time reliability meets the target set up in the same period.
Overall, the number of passengers commuting by the railroad has an upward trend in 10 years and it peaks in 2005 instead of in 2009. Meanwhile, time reliability also shows the fluctuant trend from 2000 to 2009 but it peaks and remains at the highest point in 2008 onwards. Moreover, from 2003 to 2004, the proportion of passengers is directly proportional to the result of trains running on time when they increase the number and are beyond the target at the same time.
As can be seen from the first graph, numerous train commuters were not stable during the first 4 years and in 2003 stayed at the lowest point associated with the data in 2000 at 35 million. From 2003 to 2005 witnessed a dramatic increase and the number of passengers peaked at the highest point at 46 million. However, in 2005 onwards, it slightly dropped down until 2008 stood at 40 million and gradually grew to 42 million in the last year. Although the data showed a slight increase in 2009, it was far lower than the indicator in 2005.
The data from the second graph indicate that the results were beyond the target from 2002 to middle of 2004 and the beginning of 2008 onwards. The peak of the glory in 2008 is at 96% and it stabilized till 2009. Moreover, the other period of time witnessed the results were below the target and stood at the lowest position in 2000 and 2006 at 92%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 84 | view |
| 2022-11-17 | nhungnhungnhungnhung | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-07 | tramy3805 | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-07 | tramy3805 | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-16 | phanhhh | 73 | view |
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 56
- In some countries more young adults continue to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
- As mass communication continues to grow the world is becoming more globalized Some people believe that this will inevitably lead to the total loss of cultural identity To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The youth in many countries are unemployed and unskilled while at the same time the military services are in need of people Compulsory military service is beneficial and necessary To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- Success is something that many people try to achieve What can success mean to different people What is your view of success 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 372, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s directly proportional to the result of trains running on time when they increas...
^^
Line 4, column 232, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...abilized till 2009. Moreover, the other period of time witnessed the results were below the ta...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, moreover, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 33.7804878049 172% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1281.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 280.0 196.424390244 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.575 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36597641319 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492857142857 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 351.0 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3384234254 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.454545455 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4545454545 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358850964292 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142055287669 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845851277286 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243978721984 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510126805094 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.