Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can government do to address these problems? What can individual people do?
It is acknowledged that human beings have an inextricable relationship with nature. However, in recent years, the environment has been deteriorating alarmingly. I will list some ways that humans are wrecking the environmental quality and some feasible solutions to remedy these problems.
On the one hand, humans are to blame for the degeneration of environmental quality. First of all, these fumes catastrophically exacerbate air pollution and take a heavy toll on the ozone layer. To be more specific, they give precedence to using private vehicles such as motorbikes, automobiles and the like instead of using public transports, so a massive amount of exhaust emissions are released such as CO2, CO and among others. Moreover, people exploit extravagantly energy sources and natural resources. It renders to an enormous energy consumption and the depletion of natural resources. Individuals are always in dire need of non-renewable resources such as coal and fossil fuels, but it is undeniable that they will run out in no time can be listed as an example. Furthermore, the masses often tend to use single-use products such as nylon or plastic bags and they have to be at the expense of their health. The bulk of these non-biodegradable things prompt to overload landfills, especially disposable products having an adverse bearing on the groundwater.
On the other hand, there are some viable solutions to solve these problems. Firstly, state officials need to propagandize citizens that environment is of great importance to life and empower people to take part in campaigns in which they can join in activities such as growing plants and so on. Secondly, administrators must impose strict environmental laws and have drastic measures as punishments. Besides that, people should effectuate some greener substitutes and choose sustainable lifestyle choices. For instance, they should not prioritize using single-use products. Instead of them, they can turn to utilize reusable things or carbon-free energy sources.
In a nutshell, people lead to a dire repercussion for environmental quality. We cannot help but admit that the environment is key to humans. Therefore, we should allot well-intentioned enterprise to remedy environment pollution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-15 | Lê Hồng | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-02 | paula_ngy08 | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-02 | paula_ngy08 | 89 | view |
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- People in many countries are spending less time with their family What are the reasons and effects of this 84
- Task 2 Some people believe increasing business and cultural contacts between countries are a positive development while others argue that it is a threat to identity of a nation Discuss both view and give your opinion 84
- The tables give information about the temperatures and hours of daylight in London and Sydney during the same weekend in December 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should sp 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1904.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48703170029 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25055183817 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599423631124 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.3858192036 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.35 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.95 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151814670174 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0424279929313 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379582531559 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0977455741557 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385540315135 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.