Countries should produce the food that their population eats, and import as little as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons, examples to your answer.
Food plays a vital role in persons life. Soma masses think nations should have only sufficient food that their people eat and they import only limited quality that they must need. I partially agree with this statement. I will explore about the pros and cons of this notion and try to draw some conclusion.
To begin with, there are plethora of positive impacts if nation produce more food that their masses need. Because, if a country produce more food then they export the food and import some necessary items that they need. Due to this, nations economic development is increased as well as they make good relationships with other nations. For instance, UK and America have great bondings with each other. Because, UK export food to America and America export oil to UK. Moreover, if nation will store the more food then this will help the masses in disaster situations such as earthquake and so on. For instance, in 2016, Nepal was in under earthquake and the flood therefore, Indian authorities was helped them to gave necessary things.
On the flip side, there are some negative aspects on nation to produce more food. If a country produce only that their population eats then the nation become self dependent only. For instance, India buy all the food to America but unfortunately in 2012, America stoped the export to India then indian government launched HIV seeds and they grow these seeds. Now India becomes self dependent country.
To conclude, although nation produce food that is sufficient for population and the country is self dependent. Yet, if nation grows more food then they export this and increase GDP.
- Some people think climate changes has a negative impact on business while others think that it produces more business options Discuss both the views and give your opinion 73
- The bar chart shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 73
- Nowadays more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face Is this a positive or negative development 56
- More and more businesses as well as individuals are choosing to communicate either professionally or socially using technology rather being face to face Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using technology for communicating 73
- Some people believe that hobbies need to be difficult to be enjoyable To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 147, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...Because, if a country produce more food then they export the food and import some ne...
^^^^
Line 2, column 512, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...ver, if nation will store the more food then this will help the masses in disaster s...
^^^^
Line 2, column 648, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., in 2016, Nepal was in under earthquake and the flood therefore, Indian authorit...
^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...aspects on nation to produce more food. If a country produce only that their popul...
^^
Line 4, column 143, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...pendent. Yet, if nation grows more food then they export this and increase GDP.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92727272727 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35808018285 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1346185893 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.7058823529 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1764705882 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52941176471 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15632231185 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598064164551 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608487540145 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113458686332 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0133603539724 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.