The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph chart provides information about various places that are visited by different people in Canada. The data is in the percentage.
Overall, it is seen clearly from the given bar graph that, people who were born in Canada went to cinemas the most. While migrates from other countries were at the top position in libraries, whereas people born in native English speaking nations were at the first place in terms of visiting theatres and zoos.
To comments with, the proportion of visitors who were born in Canada at libraries was over 70%, which was nearly 20% and 5% more than migrates from other countries and native English speaking ones respectively. Furthermore, nearly 10%, 25%, 20% of immigrants from countries, from English speaking and citizens of Canada visited theatres respectively.
Moreover, around 55% and 35% of newly migrates from non-English speaking countries appeared at libraries and zoos respectively, which was nearly 15% higher and lower than people from English speaking countries counterparts. In addition, over 35% of Canadian citizens preferred both libraries and zoos.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-12 | hannahbui | 11 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | hannahbui | 11 | view |
| 2021-09-29 | muhammad Hamza | 66 | view |
| 2021-09-29 | muhammad Hamza | view | |
| 2021-08-13 | priynnk1663 | 73 | view |
- Research shows that business meetings discussions and training are happening online nowadays Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The chart and graph below give information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began 73
- The maps show improvements that have been made to a university campus between 2010 and the present day 87
- The charts below give information about world spending and population 78
- The pie charts show the destination of export goods in three countries in 2010
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37714285714 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71854703089 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542857142857 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.4251527393 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.625 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113909696809 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671536524329 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0943756708138 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106150750946 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101507006919 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.