People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Risks has always been an integrated part of human lives, from when we wake up until we go to bed, we take risks. Things as mundane as crossing a road, jogging and even washing plates involve a certain amount of risk. Some people would say risk is an unavoidable aspect of life, while others would say that these risks could be avoided by careful deliberation. The prompt argues that people should make decisions only when they have deliberated on its corollaries. I mostly disagree with this prompt for two main reasons. Nevertheless, I do concede that in some cases, it is cogent for one to deliberate on the effects of an action before carrying out the action.
To begin, everything one does has a certain amount of risk attached to it and if one were to consider the risks of each action before carrying it out, they might end up not carrying out such task. For example, if one were to live in fear that what they might do would be risky, they could end up not doing anything. An action such as brushing the teeth has some harm attached to it; a person could be brushing and mistakenly bruise their gums. If this person was deliberating on the action and thinking severely of the action, he might be scared to brush and end up not doing that. Many of the actions that we do on a daily basis involves some amount of risks so it is not practicable to think about every one of them. This consideration could lead to delaying or forestalling the action.
Furthermore, careful consideration of actions could hinder scientific research. For example when Benjamin Franklin walked out into the storm to test his theory of electricity, he may not have carefully considered the repercussions of this experiment. If he had not done that, scientists may not have been to extend their understanding of electricity. Similarly, some scientists are aware of the serious consequence their research could have on people but they do it nevertheless. Paul Muller invented insecticides that we use to control insects. He might have known that this invention was potent when ingested by humans. Although it has been used by people for suicide, it has been of significant help for the reduction of mosquitoes in Africa. Thus, if one were to carefully consider the effects of an action, science may not progress.
Admittedly, in some cases, it is advisable to deliberate the risks of an action before taking the action. Today gambling is one of the problems of some people. These people started of gambling little by little. If they had considered the long term negative effects if would have on them rather than the positive part of gambling, then they may not have started gambling at all. Similarly, a lot of people in prison confessed to not having thought fully well of their actions and if they could revise time, they would nit engage in such actions. Thus, it is reasonable for one to think fully about the positive and negative consequences of an action before taking the action.
In conclusion, People should not deliberate on their actions before they carry out these actions. However, I concede that in some cases, deliberate action could lead to well reasoned actions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-07 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | ice123 | 58 | view |
| 2022-09-30 | YACHI PATEL | 50 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Sujan Adhikari | 70 | view |
| 2022-08-04 | Tee_Jay | 33 | view |
- Evidence suggests that academic honor codes which call for students to agree not to cheat in their academic endeavors and to notify a faculty member if they suspect that others have cheated are far more successful than are other methods at deterring cheat 68
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be su 66
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be su 66
- The perceived greatness of any political leader has more to do with the challenges faced by that leader than with any of his or her inherent skills and abilities 83
- College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to ad 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... human lives, from when we wake up until we go to bed, we take risks. Things as m...
^^
Line 3, column 523, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ul Muller invented insecticides that we use to control insects. He might have known...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, similarly, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 33.0505617978 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 84.0 58.6224719101 143% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2619.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 548.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77919708029 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83832613839 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65940155257 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.443430656934 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 823.5 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 6.24550561798 256% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0832626308 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5357142857 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 5.13820224719 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181233703183 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582807972779 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416875035829 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11805841911 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346901168266 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.