The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main.
The graph illustrates the changes in the consumption pattern of Australian teenagers for three kinds of fast foods over the period of 26 years from 1975 to 2000.
At the start of the period, the popularity of pizza and hamburgers were recorded low among the youngsters of Australia. While teenagers liked having fish and chips in the year 1975, their interests slightly dropped by the year 1980 and at the same time, the pizza and hamburgers started peaking the market. For the year 1985, both hamburgers and fish and chips had a similar amount of sales followed by a decline in the sales of fish and chips, on the contrary hamburgers steadily held its market.
The amount of pizza and hamburgers consumed followed a similar trend but hamburgers were always selling more than pizza. The consumption of pizza remained constant slightly over 80 from the year 1995 till 2000.
Overall, the food intake has increased by the end of 2000. Although, fish and chips were most popular initially, its market share failed by the end with a fluctuation near the beginning. Whereas, the sales of both pizza and hamburgers climbed touching the number 100.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-21 | sinisterchill9 | 61 | view |
| 2021-12-11 | Jenna Vu | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-18 | kwuynh | 80 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | Tabassum Zaman | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-28 | lwof | 82 | view |
- Many problems o modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system because moral behavior cannot be legislated 66
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well being of the societies and environments in which they operate Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations provided they operate within the law is to make as mu 66
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 53
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- The bar chart below shows the money spent per week on public transport by age group in Malaysia in the year 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93298969072 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51774972196 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536082474227 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6071123432 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.333333333 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141363760645 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670027827833 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0900088244863 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116299213236 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109244404396 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.