Percentage participation of men in Senior development position
The bar graph presents the percentage of males in senior development positions from 1980 to 2010.
Overall, the figure for men’s participation in senior positions showed upward trend in IBM and Microsoft, and employer in IBM senior development becaming the biggest percentages than others. However, the figure for Apple’s men positions fluctuated.
At the beginning, around less than fifth percent men joined as senior development of IBM, being the most percentages in 1980. Moreover, it is followed by Microsoft and Apple with around 8% and 1% respectively. By the end of 30 years, however, the figure for men as a senior development position at all companies had seen increased significantly and showed the reverse rank. The former being the highest proportion with just over three-fifths percent and the others had risen with 45% and 25% running.
A More detailed look at the graph reveals that the proportion of involvement of men in prominent positions in IBM and Apple showed upward trend. Between 1989 and 2010, the former increased significantly, reaching a peak in 2010, and the figure for men’s participation in Apple saw Continuous and steady rise just around 2% between 1980 and 2000, showing the highest percentages in 2010 by just over a quarter. However, the figure for men senior worker in Microsoft fluctuated, after stagnating briefly in 1990, then showed period of volatility toward the end of the year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | view | |
| 2024-11-22 | trpg143 | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
- Free time activities of the elderly in The United States from 1980 to the present 75
- The graph gives information about drinking habits of the US population by age 67
- Percentages of U S adults who are worried about their exposure to the coronavirus in February and March 84
- Cases of whooping cough Britain 1940 1990 87
- The chart shows the weight assessment of inhabitants of Charlestown in 1955 and 2015 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 52, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'man'?
Suggestion: man
...nning, around less than a fifth percent men joined as senior development of IBM, be...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, however, if, look, moreover, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1210.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21551724138 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91134359394 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504310344828 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1761515236 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417273735242 0.215688989381 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181452728519 0.103423049105 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136440228988 0.0843802449381 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.310506831676 0.15604864568 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0977701711876 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.