Some people prefer to do the same job in the same place, but others prefer to change jobs frequently. You should use specific reasons to compare the advantages and disadvantages of both sides.
While lifetime employment is favored by some individuals; others tend to switch jobs on a regular basis. This essay will evaluate the merits and demerits of both decisions.
Permanent jobs can do wonders for people’s lives. Attaining more experience with their occupations as time flies, workers would possess greater opportunities to get promoted for their dedication and loyalty. Besides, not only do permanent employees get a steady paycheck but also benefit from retirement savings plans. Nevertheless, having a steady job may have pernicious effects on productivity as workers might be fed up with doing the same thing frequently. Moreover, as the job is steady, the schedule is fixed, and limited alterations can be made.
Changing jobs is also both advantageous and disadvantageous. Regarding the pros, job-hopping is such a feasible aid to accumulating a wide range of skills. This is derived from the fact that as for having been exposed to different working environments, it’s much easier to adapt and be flexible, which are both valuable skills. Additionally, the timetable is usually flexible so employees can easily balance the quality time for their families and careers. However, job hopping does pose some disadvantages. Moving jobs frequently, we may lose a sense of belonging, which is a feeling of being surrounded by those who we trust and like. Moreover, frequent job changers may lack in-depth knowledge which can be acquired through many years working in the same corporation.
In conclusion, since each of the discussed choices exposes unique strengths and weaknesses, my verdict is that people should consider their abilities and interests before pursuing their careers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-29 | lennie.butera | 78 | view |
- Influence of human beings on the world s ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio diversity What are the primary causes of loss of bio diversity What solutions can you suggest 84
- The government should invest more money in teaching science than in other subjects for a country s development and progress To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The government should invest more money in teaching science than in other subjects for a country s development and progress To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that it is better to live and work in vertical cities Others however think that horizontal cities are better for living and working Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Some people think that parents have a great influence on their children Others believe that the media is a bigger influence Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, while, as for, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1452.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47924528302 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00803717511 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660377358491 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7782914832 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218779395662 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786767139444 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662608659194 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11478397953 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471501408538 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.