People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
The topic raises a controversial issue of whether the people who makes decision based on emotions and later justifies them with logics are poor decision makers. The speakers' opinion is that these people are poor decision makers. In my opinion, those who take decisions based on emotions and then justifies them with logics are not always poor decision makers. I majorly disagree with the author's viewpoints and will argue that emotions are also very important in decision making and those decisions could also be turned to success and thereby justified with logics.
Firstly, to show the importance of emotions in decision making I will use an example from the life of Ratan Tata which he discussed in an interview. He was humiliated by the Ford when he went to sign a deal to sell the Tata Motors to Ford due to the heavy losses. But due the humiliation, Tata took an emotional call and returned to India without making the dealt. Later on, he worked hard and Tata Motors came on the lines of huge profits. In this way, Tata justified his decision based on emotion with logics and hard work afterwards.
Furthermore, I would like to share an experience from my personal life. My grandmother was ill and doctors declared that the chances of survival are very less and spending further on treatment may be worthless. But my father took an emotional call and kept on spending further and consulting senior doctors and hospital. As a result, my grandmother recovered. This example shows that every decision cannot be taken on logics at the first stage and an emotion-based decision can also be truly justified with logics later.
However, the arguments provided by me also has some exceptions. If a doctor starts taking decision on the basis of emotions in the operation theatre and try to justify it later with logics, it would jeopardise the risk of patients life. This example reflects that emotions based decision making is also not right in every situation and circumstances.
In conclusion, I believe that an emotion-based decision-maker who later justifies it with logic is not necessarily a poor decision-maker. This decision-making process is also subject to conditions. The first and second example shows how the emotional decision can also turn to a good decision while the third example shows some exception also based upon the profession and circumstances.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-30 | yixova3193 | 66 | view |
| 2023-11-03 | Aishwarya01 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | Truss | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Adesina Boluwatito | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | shamika@25 | 50 | view |
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 58
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 16
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field Write 66
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'speakers'' or 'speaker's'?
Suggestion: speakers'; speaker's
...th logics are poor decision makers. The speakers opinion is that these people are poor d...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, then, third, while, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1984.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 395.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02278481013 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79913004088 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475949367089 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.4887623485 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.577795995551 0.243740707755 237% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.204347611355 0.0831039109588 246% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.196662376978 0.0758088955206 259% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.360130941673 0.150359130593 240% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.192224141821 0.0667264976115 288% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.