The table below shows the figures (in thousand) for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980.
The table gives information about the figure for prison in 5 different countries in the period from 1930 to 1980.
Looking from an overall perspective, the scenario for the volatility of all figures had shifted dramatically throughout the time frame.
Turning to the figure involvement imprisonment in Great Britain, it increased over the whole survey from 30 in 1930 to surpass 80 in 1980. Meanwhile, the figure for Australia followed a downward fluctuation it reached the lowest point in 1950 at 45 after decreasing from 70 in the first year and finished the survey with roughly 68.
On the other hand, New Zealand saw its figure correlated with Australia when it started at 100, then varied to touch less than 90 in 1980. In addition, it witnessed to bottoming at approximately 50 in 1950.
Regarding the imprisonment figure in Canada, it reached 120 in the beginning, followed by a moderate decline to 110 in 1940, before increasing to 115 in 1950. Subsequently, this figure dropped significantly till 1970, when it had a slightly recovered to 90.
It is worth noting that the figure for the US, which was the only object that fluctuated upward, finally reached 138 higher than the original point at 120.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-12 | phuongnguyen1234 | 67 | view |
| 2022-05-29 | Dhvani Bhanushali | 62 | view |
| 2022-05-29 | Dhvani Bhanushali | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-12 | vanditaverma.v@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2021-12-11 | lapkhanh | view |
- The diagram below shows the average hours of unpaid work per week done by people in different categories Unpaid work refers to such activities as childcare in the home housework and gardening 78
- The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005 73
- The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010
- The graph shows Internet usage in Taiwan by age group 56
- The bar chart below shows a survey of a group of young professionals aged 20 30 years who were asked to state which factors motivated them to succeed 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the only object that fluctuated upward, finally reached 138 higher than the orig...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, look, regarding, so, then, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95098039216 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85090217548 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622549019608 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6231921131 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.222222222 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237705056521 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992171071458 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883209583697 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127203793361 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0908805107037 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.