The line graph below shows changes in the amount of coffee exported from three countries between 2002 and 2012. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart illustrates how the figure for three various countries’ coffee exportation from 2002 to 2012.
Overall, the amount of Brazil’s coffee exportation was the highest throughout most of the period shown. Also, the figure for coffee exported from these three countries followed an upward trend over the period.
In 2002, Costa Rica exported 15 million kilograms of coffee, comparing with around 12.5 million kilograms of Brazil and only 5 million kilograms of Columbia. Over the next 4 years, the amount of coffee exported from Brazil and Columbia followed a similar pattern, increasing to 15 million and about 12 million kilograms respectively. In the meantime, this period witnessed a gradual decrease of approximately 11 million kilograms in the figure for Costa Rica’s coffee exportation.
In the next 6 years, there was a fluctuation between 15 million and 25 million kilograms in the amount of coffee exported from Brazil before reaching a peak of almost 25 million kilograms in 2012. Meanwhile, a growth of roughly 14 million kilograms was observed in the figure for Costa Rica’s coffee exportation in this period. In contrast, the amount of coffee exported from Columbia showed a decrease to about 2 million kilograms in 2008 and then rose back to 15 million in 2012.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-07 | myduyen282 | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | myduyen282 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-12 | letrang250191 | 67 | view |
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The following diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town 73
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 84
- Question 2 Fossil fuel is the main source of energy In some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged Is this a positive or negative development 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1087.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2009569378 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78907561564 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.44976076555 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2728334393 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.777777778 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190858178718 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115594246731 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074864075602 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170072688886 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765785448731 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.