The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005.
The chart gives information about the rate of employment classified into male and female in 6 countries between 1995 and 2005.
Looking from an overall perspective, all the figures fluctuated unstably throughout the time frame. Switzerland's figure for males in 2005 was responsible for the highest proportion in the survey.
Regarding the employment rate of males in 1995, it saw its figure peaked at more than 70% in Iceland, followed by Switzerland with 65%, which was 10% higher than in Australia. The proportion in New Zealand and the USA hovered around 50%. Meanwhile, this figure was recorded to the bottom at 55% in the UK.
There was a significant drop in the percentage of employment in all nations in the next ten years. To be precise, the rate of Iceland of Aus went down noticeably by 30%, and 35% was the decrease percentage of New Zealand. In the USA, Switzerland and the UK, their proportion fell by nearly 15%, 10%, and 5%, respectively.
On the other hand, the Ice land's proportion for females started at 80% then plunged half in 2005, while Switzerland showed a considerable decline in their figure from 77% to 67%. AUs and Iceland witnessed a moderate reduction to the same level of 28%, after having a trivial distance of 5%, with the former surpassed 70%. The UK and USA percentage also had more than 70% in 1995, slumped the level to 50% and 45% in turn.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-29 | anna103 | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-21 | Mandeep kaur kaur | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | beauty flowers | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | beauty flowers | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-23 | soomi2209 | 78 | view |
- The diagram below shows the average hours of unpaid work per week done by people in different categories Unpaid work refers to such activities as childcare in the home housework and gardening 78
- The table below shows the figures in thousand for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980 84
- the bar chart below shows the results of a poll of theater goers on what disturbs them during performances at the theatre 55
- The bar chart below shows a survey of a group of young professionals aged 20 30 years who were asked to state which factors motivated them to succeed 89
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they receive from employers 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, regarding, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75416666667 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73274574477 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5875 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4905112514 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0833333333 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167859149053 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589586276962 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921487918597 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115348586659 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115647990418 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.