The bar chart illustrates the percentage of businesses in the UK who had a social media presence from 2012 to 2016.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided chart compares three different types of businesses in terms of social media presence over the 5-year period from 2012 to 2016.
A glance at the chart reveal that over the observed period, large business was the leader in presenting on social media, while small business showed the least use of the Internet.
As presented in the bar chart, in 2012, nearly 30% of small manufacturers joined the social media, whereas more than 30% of medium businesses participated in. Large corporations, on the other hand, showed the highest proportion of social media presence with nearly 80%. While the figure for social media usage of large businesses remain unchanged in 2013 and experienced a slight decline in 2014, that of small companies exhibited a moderate increase to 30% in 2013 and about 3% in 2014. In contrast, the percentage of social media presence of medium corporations increased significantly by nearly 20% in 2013 and kept rising slightly in 2014.
In 2015, small, medium and large businesses showed a sharp fall in the proportion of social media presence, with 30%, 30% and 50% respectively. At the end of the surveyed period, all three types of corporation rose significantly. While large businesses was the leader in this field with nearly 80%, the statisctics of small and medium companies was about 50%.
- The bar chart illustrates the percentage of businesses in the UK who had a social media presence from 2012 to 2016 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 63
- The chart illustrates distances traveled per person per week in kilometers in terms of 5 types of transport in the UK between 1990 and 2000 61
- The bar chart below shows transport preferences among young people in four countries in a single year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- The diagram below shows the changes of a village in 1995 and now 78
- The maps below show Pancha Village in 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
Comments
Never heard of ICP?…
Never heard of ICP? Basically, your ICP will drive every part of the sales funnel . Pretty cool, huh? So how does it all work? Your icp in sales allows you to choose which customers you want to sell to https://www.growbots.com/blog/icp-outbound-sales/ . I know that sounds a little unsettling to those who are starting out. After all, you're trying to get as much revenue as possible. It would be illogical to try to limit the range of clients you want to attract. In my experience, that's not the case at all. Consider these points: You have a limited amount of resources to find leads. Every minute you spend selling to a deadbeat is a minute you could have spent actually closing the deal. Getting a good customer should give you time and money to focus on improving your business.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1095890411 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75610023195 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502283105023 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0846056572 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.333333333 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200947457471 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100078305558 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700870229084 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149899457729 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707632750863 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.