TPO 03: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.
Good friends are the most valuable possessions in our life since they can lift us and help us grow. When it comes to friendship, a typical question is whether to keep old friends or make new ones. I subscribe to the view that making new friends outweighs in benefits.
The first and most important reason is that new friends will always help us expand our social circle. Besides, It could also open up doors of new opportunities that will help us realize our potentials and reach our dreams. Moreover, research has shown that people with a greater social circle would normally have higher salaries. My personal experience also confirms that. For example, When I entered the Sharif University of Technology, I met numerous people. I spent a tremendous amount of time with few of them. After getting my master's degree, one of them helped me apply to one of the top rank universities in Computer Science (Standford University).
Second, some radical changes make us change our friends. As people get older and older, it becomes more probable that their interests and habits change entirely. While it is often a good sign, our relationship with old friends might diminish over the long run. For instance, when I was studying in high school, I had a few religious friends with whom I went to the mosque. After entering university, as my beliefs changed, I didn't want to accompany them to the mosque. Instead, I get acquainted with a whole new era of places I could go with my new friends. I feel in this way the nature has separated us.
In summary, while it is immensely valuable to keep old friends, I think It is more profitable if we make new ones. It is because changing friends will open up lots of job opportunities that help us succeed in life. Also, from time to time, Mother Nature makes us change to new friends.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-23 | Yam Kumar Oli | 60 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | sonyeoso | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-06 | fmichela | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | Muggle1313 | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | Muggle1313 | 70 | view |
- A university recognized first year students have poor study skills in its university Some in the university believe the best way to address this is to ask all first year students have to pass course on study skills Others don t agree with this requirement 76
- TPO 47 Question Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 80
- TPO 03 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One can learn about another person from the books and movies that the person likes 90
- TPO 03 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 426, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ng university, as my beliefs changed, I didnt want to accompany them to the mosque. I...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, moreover, second, so, while, for example, for instance, i feel, i think, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 321.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68847352025 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59337889171 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570093457944 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.070101715 48.9658058833 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.25 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.05 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228238662069 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726664226981 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705958156067 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1626416128 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578156764465 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 11.7677419355 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.